<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 549 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256549</link>
    <description>A published tribunal order and the related show cause notice were not covered by the exemption for commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property under Rule 8(1)(d) of the RTI Rules. Because the material related to a decided matter and disclosure would not prejudice any person, the claimed exemption could not be sustained. The CPIO was therefore required to provide the requested order-in-original and show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 549 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256549</link>
      <description>A published tribunal order and the related show cause notice were not covered by the exemption for commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property under Rule 8(1)(d) of the RTI Rules. Because the material related to a decided matter and disclosure would not prejudice any person, the claimed exemption could not be sustained. The CPIO was therefore required to provide the requested order-in-original and show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>