<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 532 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256532</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the expenditure if paid within the relevant financial year, based on the ITAT Special Bench decision. The judgment highlighted the binding nature of the ITAT decision until reversed by the High Court, clarifying the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for the given context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 532 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256532</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the expenditure if paid within the relevant financial year, based on the ITAT Special Bench decision. The judgment highlighted the binding nature of the ITAT decision until reversed by the High Court, clarifying the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for the given context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>