<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 502 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256502</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the deduction under Section 80-IA, allowing the claim for both units based on the inclusion of workers on contract services as employees. The Court held that workers under contract labor basis can be considered employees for the purpose of Section 80-IA. However, the Court sided with the Department on the disallowance of staff welfare expenditure, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow a portion of the expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 502 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256502</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the deduction under Section 80-IA, allowing the claim for both units based on the inclusion of workers on contract services as employees. The Court held that workers under contract labor basis can be considered employees for the purpose of Section 80-IA. However, the Court sided with the Department on the disallowance of staff welfare expenditure, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow a portion of the expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>