<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 496 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by the Assessee for AYs 2003-04 and 2004-05, referring the unaccounted investment in land issue back to the AO for reevaluation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2003-04 was dismissed, upholding the deletion of the addition by the Ld.CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:35:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 496 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by the Assessee for AYs 2003-04 and 2004-05, referring the unaccounted investment in land issue back to the AO for reevaluation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2003-04 was dismissed, upholding the deletion of the addition by the Ld.CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>