<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168284</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the bank guarantee, as amended, was unconditional and must be honored by the bank upon demand. Allegations of fraud and claims of irretrievable injury were found insufficiently supported. The decision emphasized principles governing bank guarantee invocation and limited grounds for enforcement restraint. The order had no impact on the pending case before the Arbitral Tribunal, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168284</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the bank guarantee, as amended, was unconditional and must be honored by the bank upon demand. Allegations of fraud and claims of irretrievable injury were found insufficiently supported. The decision emphasized principles governing bank guarantee invocation and limited grounds for enforcement restraint. The order had no impact on the pending case before the Arbitral Tribunal, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>