<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256471</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the penalty imposed on the director for CENVAT credit variances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The judgment thoroughly analyzed discrepancies in input materials, finished goods, captively consumed goods, duty on cleared goods, and CENVAT credit variances, providing detailed reasoning for the decisions made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256471</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the penalty imposed on the director for CENVAT credit variances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The judgment thoroughly analyzed discrepancies in input materials, finished goods, captively consumed goods, duty on cleared goods, and CENVAT credit variances, providing detailed reasoning for the decisions made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>