https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256467 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of input service tax credit under Notification No. 5/2006. It was determined that the input services were used in providing output services, and credit availed before registration was permissible. The Tribunal broadened the scope of admissibility of input services, citing previous judgments, and found no reason to deny the refund based on late registration. The appeals were dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld, with a directive to sanction the refund to the respondent within two months. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256467 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of input service tax credit under Notification No. 5/2006. It was determined that the input services were used in providing output services, and credit availed before registration was permissible. The Tribunal broadened the scope of admissibility of input services, citing previous judgments, and found no reason to deny the refund based on late registration. The appeals were dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld, with a directive to sanction the refund to the respondent within two months. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256467