<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 462 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039; rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals against Orders-in-Original, directing the Commissioner to hear all four appeals on merit. The Tribunal found the appeals were not time-barred and that the monetary limit for filing appeals did not apply in this case. Both parties were instructed to have adequate opportunities for submissions and personal hearings in the remanded proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 462 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039; rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals against Orders-in-Original, directing the Commissioner to hear all four appeals on merit. The Tribunal found the appeals were not time-barred and that the monetary limit for filing appeals did not apply in this case. Both parties were instructed to have adequate opportunities for submissions and personal hearings in the remanded proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>