<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256448</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the assessing officer, emphasizing the assessment under section 115JB of the Act and the acceptance of book profits for the assessee. The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on the legal principles and precedents cited by the CIT(A) in support of deleting the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256448</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the assessing officer, emphasizing the assessment under section 115JB of the Act and the acceptance of book profits for the assessee. The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on the legal principles and precedents cited by the CIT(A) in support of deleting the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>