<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 442 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The discrepancies in interest payments claimed by the assessee and the bank were attributed to the bank&#039;s internal accounting procedures, absolving the assessee of deliberate wrongdoing. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s actions to be bonafide, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 07:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 442 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The discrepancies in interest payments claimed by the assessee and the bank were attributed to the bank&#039;s internal accounting procedures, absolving the assessee of deliberate wrongdoing. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s actions to be bonafide, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>