<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 439 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that both project completion and percentage completion methods could be valid for computing income from construction projects, depending on circumstances. It emphasized that income must be taxed for the relevant period and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine if income accrual conditions under AS-9 were met for each project. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 439 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that both project completion and percentage completion methods could be valid for computing income from construction projects, depending on circumstances. It emphasized that income must be taxed for the relevant period and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine if income accrual conditions under AS-9 were met for each project. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>