https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256437 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking relief against the order confiscating gold and imposing a penalty under the Customs Act, 1962, citing the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal to the Commissioner (Appeal). The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal within four weeks, with the appellate authority required to decide on the appeal within eight weeks. The court emphasized that in fiscal matters, approaching the court under Article 226 is not appropriate when a statutory remedy of appeal exists. en-us Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:31:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256437 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking relief against the order confiscating gold and imposing a penalty under the Customs Act, 1962, citing the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal to the Commissioner (Appeal). The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal within four weeks, with the appellate authority required to decide on the appeal within eight weeks. The court emphasized that in fiscal matters, approaching the court under Article 226 is not appropriate when a statutory remedy of appeal exists. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256437