https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168273 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to deny the appellants' claim to a disputed passage in a building, ruling that it was not part of their tenancy or an easement of necessity. The Court found that alternative access was available and dismissed the argument that the passage was granted as an easement to all tenants due to lack of evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay costs. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168273 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to deny the appellants' claim to a disputed passage in a building, ruling that it was not part of their tenancy or an easement of necessity. The Court found that alternative access was available and dismissed the argument that the passage was granted as an easement to all tenants due to lack of evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168273