https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168269 Administrator appointed on supersession of a municipality may exercise the functions of the municipal body, including giving written consent for prosecution as the local authority under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The later commencement of that Act does not prevent the Administrator from exercising powers that the Commissioners or Chairman would have exercised if the municipality had remained in office. Consent granted by the Administrator therefore validates prosecution for storing adulterated food and is not invalid merely because elected Commissioners did not grant it. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168269 Administrator appointed on supersession of a municipality may exercise the functions of the municipal body, including giving written consent for prosecution as the local authority under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The later commencement of that Act does not prevent the Administrator from exercising powers that the Commissioners or Chairman would have exercised if the municipality had remained in office. Consent granted by the Administrator therefore validates prosecution for storing adulterated food and is not invalid merely because elected Commissioners did not grant it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168269