<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that cutting and slitting paper does not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The activity of converting paper rolls into sheets does not change the paper&#039;s identity, thus not meeting the definition of manufacture. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that cutting and slitting paper does not constitute manufacture, despite misclassification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that cutting and slitting paper does not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The activity of converting paper rolls into sheets does not change the paper&#039;s identity, thus not meeting the definition of manufacture. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that cutting and slitting paper does not constitute manufacture, despite misclassification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>