<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 379 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Section 112 of the Customs Act for illegal imports and diversion of goods into the domestic market. It was held that penalties were not imposable for imports made through ICD, TKD, as the case had been settled by the Settlement Commission. Additionally, as the appellants were not involved in imports through Mumbai port, penalties were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 379 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants under Section 112 of the Customs Act for illegal imports and diversion of goods into the domestic market. It was held that penalties were not imposable for imports made through ICD, TKD, as the case had been settled by the Settlement Commission. Additionally, as the appellants were not involved in imports through Mumbai port, penalties were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>