<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 378 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256378</link>
    <description>Imported second-hand multifunctional copier machines were considered in the context of the import policy and hazardous waste regime, with the dispute turning on whether they required environmental clearance and authorisation. Because the application before the competent environmental authority was already pending, the Delhi HC directed that authority to determine whether the goods fell within the category of hazardous waste under the governing rules, taking into account the earlier decisions cited. The writ proceeding was thus disposed of by remitting the matter for fresh classification and clearance determination, rather than deciding the merits of the goods&#039; status itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 378 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256378</link>
      <description>Imported second-hand multifunctional copier machines were considered in the context of the import policy and hazardous waste regime, with the dispute turning on whether they required environmental clearance and authorisation. Because the application before the competent environmental authority was already pending, the Delhi HC directed that authority to determine whether the goods fell within the category of hazardous waste under the governing rules, taking into account the earlier decisions cited. The writ proceeding was thus disposed of by remitting the matter for fresh classification and clearance determination, rather than deciding the merits of the goods&#039; status itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>