<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 353 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that they were not in default for failing to deduct TDS while making payments to a non-resident. The Tribunal considered that the payments were not taxable as the vendors had already made investments qualifying for exemption under sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, negating the imposition of interest under section 201(1A) and dismissing the stay applications as redundant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 353 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that they were not in default for failing to deduct TDS while making payments to a non-resident. The Tribunal considered that the payments were not taxable as the vendors had already made investments qualifying for exemption under sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, negating the imposition of interest under section 201(1A) and dismissing the stay applications as redundant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>