<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168258</link>
    <description>Law charges incurred to contest proceedings before the Income-tax Investigation Commission were treated as deductible business expenditure because the expression &quot;for the purpose of the business&quot; is wider than earning profits and includes protection of business assets and resistance to coercive or unlawful interference. Applying that principle, expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively to safeguard the business from proposed additional taxation and penalties was regarded as commercially expedient and allowable under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The reference was answered against the revenue, and the assessee&#039;s deduction claim and costs were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168258</link>
      <description>Law charges incurred to contest proceedings before the Income-tax Investigation Commission were treated as deductible business expenditure because the expression &quot;for the purpose of the business&quot; is wider than earning profits and includes protection of business assets and resistance to coercive or unlawful interference. Applying that principle, expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively to safeguard the business from proposed additional taxation and penalties was regarded as commercially expedient and allowable under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The reference was answered against the revenue, and the assessee&#039;s deduction claim and costs were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>