<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CHA Firm&#039;s License Revoked for Forgery and Fraud; Partners Admit Lack of Importer Knowledge, Eliminating Proof Requirement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21725</link>
    <description>Revocation of CHA License - forgery and fraud - when the partners of the appellant CHA firm themselves have admitted to not knowing the importer, there is no need to prove the case by the department as the settled legal position is that admitted facts need not be proved - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:28:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CHA Firm&#039;s License Revoked for Forgery and Fraud; Partners Admit Lack of Importer Knowledge, Eliminating Proof Requirement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21725</link>
      <description>Revocation of CHA License - forgery and fraud - when the partners of the appellant CHA firm themselves have admitted to not knowing the importer, there is no need to prove the case by the department as the settled legal position is that admitted facts need not be proved - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:28:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>