<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 347 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an SEZ developer, allowing their refund claim for service tax paid on services used for SEZ operations. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund within one year of tax payment, emphasizing the relevance of the services to SEZ operations. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s refund claim as timely filed, setting aside the initial rejection and granting consequential relief. This case underscores the significance of legislative intent in tax matters and the importance of adhering to prescribed time limits for refund claims under relevant statutes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 347 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an SEZ developer, allowing their refund claim for service tax paid on services used for SEZ operations. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund within one year of tax payment, emphasizing the relevance of the services to SEZ operations. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s refund claim as timely filed, setting aside the initial rejection and granting consequential relief. This case underscores the significance of legislative intent in tax matters and the importance of adhering to prescribed time limits for refund claims under relevant statutes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>