https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256339 The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit of M/s. D.M. Mehta & Bros. for contravening CHALR, 2004 regulations. Despite challenges regarding reliance on un-cross-examined statements and lack of witness examination, the Tribunal affirmed the findings of license subletting and fraudulent activities. The penalty was deemed proportionate given the gravity of the offenses, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256339 The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit of M/s. D.M. Mehta & Bros. for contravening CHALR, 2004 regulations. Despite challenges regarding reliance on un-cross-examined statements and lack of witness examination, the Tribunal affirmed the findings of license subletting and fraudulent activities. The penalty was deemed proportionate given the gravity of the offenses, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256339