<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 650 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168254</link>
    <description>Slitting jumbo rolls of thermal paper into smaller rolls does not amount to manufacture where the process does not create a new and distinct article with a separate identity. The Tribunal held that the character and end use of the goods remain unchanged after slitting or cutting, so mere size reduction is insufficient to constitute manufacture. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 650 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168254</link>
      <description>Slitting jumbo rolls of thermal paper into smaller rolls does not amount to manufacture where the process does not create a new and distinct article with a separate identity. The Tribunal held that the character and end use of the goods remain unchanged after slitting or cutting, so mere size reduction is insufficient to constitute manufacture. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>