<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 305 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256305</link>
    <description>Where the department reopens a finalized assessment for the same period on a different ground, the assessee may contest all connected issues in defence and the earlier assessment cannot be treated as conclusive to exclude the refund claim. The reopened proceedings required reconsideration of the refund claim on merits, and the adjudicating authority was directed to examine the claim afresh. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 305 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256305</link>
      <description>Where the department reopens a finalized assessment for the same period on a different ground, the assessee may contest all connected issues in defence and the earlier assessment cannot be treated as conclusive to exclude the refund claim. The reopened proceedings required reconsideration of the refund claim on merits, and the adjudicating authority was directed to examine the claim afresh. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>