https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256296 The judgment addressed an application seeking condonation of a 352-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA). The court held that the delay was not adequately explained, emphasizing the burden of proof on the party seeking condonation to show a genuine cause for the delay. As the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal itself due to being time-barred. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:27:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256296 The judgment addressed an application seeking condonation of a 352-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA). The court held that the delay was not adequately explained, emphasizing the burden of proof on the party seeking condonation to show a genuine cause for the delay. As the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal itself due to being time-barred. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256296