<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. It was determined that the assessee had not concealed income particulars or furnished inaccurate details with a mala fide intention. The Tribunal emphasized that disclosing complete transaction details, even if claims were not legally allowable, did not warrant penalty imposition. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. It was determined that the assessee had not concealed income particulars or furnished inaccurate details with a mala fide intention. The Tribunal emphasized that disclosing complete transaction details, even if claims were not legally allowable, did not warrant penalty imposition. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>