<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256274</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, finding no substantial question of law. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377;12.00 lakhs, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on flats provided to the land owner should be determined by the Tribunal based on valuation methods under the Finance Act, 1994. The Court declined to comment on potential amendments or rules affecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256274</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, finding no substantial question of law. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377;12.00 lakhs, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on flats provided to the land owner should be determined by the Tribunal based on valuation methods under the Finance Act, 1994. The Court declined to comment on potential amendments or rules affecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>