<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 269 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256269</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to verify documents submitted by the appellants to determine if there was suppression of facts justifying an extended limitation period for duty demand. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the duty demand and penalty, providing the appellants with a hearing. The appeals were allowed for remand to the original authority for fresh consideration in light of the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 269 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256269</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to verify documents submitted by the appellants to determine if there was suppression of facts justifying an extended limitation period for duty demand. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the duty demand and penalty, providing the appellants with a hearing. The appeals were allowed for remand to the original authority for fresh consideration in light of the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>