<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 634 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168244</link>
    <description>A candidate for a State Legislative Assembly must have attained twenty-five years of age under Article 173(b), and acceptance of a nomination does not cure a constitutional disqualification. In an election challenge, the petitioner bears the initial burden, but Section 106 of the Evidence Act may apply to facts specially within the returned candidate&#039;s knowledge. The Court assessed school records, electoral records, the bail application, the Bihar School Examination Board record, and surrounding circumstances together, found the school documents unreliable, and treated the candidate&#039;s own conduct as significant. On the material as a whole, the candidate was found to be below the qualifying age, and the election was declared void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 16:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 634 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168244</link>
      <description>A candidate for a State Legislative Assembly must have attained twenty-five years of age under Article 173(b), and acceptance of a nomination does not cure a constitutional disqualification. In an election challenge, the petitioner bears the initial burden, but Section 106 of the Evidence Act may apply to facts specially within the returned candidate&#039;s knowledge. The Court assessed school records, electoral records, the bail application, the Bihar School Examination Board record, and surrounding circumstances together, found the school documents unreliable, and treated the candidate&#039;s own conduct as significant. On the material as a whole, the candidate was found to be below the qualifying age, and the election was declared void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>