https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168241 An unappealed order in a connected matter did not prevent examination of the common legal issue in the present challenge, so the State's preliminary objection failed. On the service-notification question, the amended notification was construed purposively to remove pay anomalies and extend benefits to diploma-holder engineers; operators-cum-mechanics/electricians were treated as within that class despite different designation and lower pay scale. The Court also relied on the grant of the same benefit to similarly placed employees and found denial to the respondents arbitrary and discriminatory. The respondents were therefore entitled to redesignation and the revised pay scale as Sub-Assistant Engineers, and the High Court's relief was sustained. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168241 An unappealed order in a connected matter did not prevent examination of the common legal issue in the present challenge, so the State's preliminary objection failed. On the service-notification question, the amended notification was construed purposively to remove pay anomalies and extend benefits to diploma-holder engineers; operators-cum-mechanics/electricians were treated as within that class despite different designation and lower pay scale. The Court also relied on the grant of the same benefit to similarly placed employees and found denial to the respondents arbitrary and discriminatory. The respondents were therefore entitled to redesignation and the revised pay scale as Sub-Assistant Engineers, and the High Court's relief was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168241