https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256218 Declared export value was accepted because the adjudication and appellate orders did not show application of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Export Goods) Rules, 2007, including whether Rule 8 or the sequential valuation method had been followed. The Tribunal noted that neither order raised any doubt about the declared value, while the goods remained under seizure and confiscation. On that basis, it held that the matter was not fit to be kept pending or remanded and allowed the appeal. en-us Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256218 Declared export value was accepted because the adjudication and appellate orders did not show application of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Export Goods) Rules, 2007, including whether Rule 8 or the sequential valuation method had been followed. The Tribunal noted that neither order raised any doubt about the declared value, while the goods remained under seizure and confiscation. On that basis, it held that the matter was not fit to be kept pending or remanded and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256218