<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) invalid as it did not comply with the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Tribunal deleted the ALP adjustment of Rs. 4,25,09,332, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the additional ground raised by the assessee as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) invalid as it did not comply with the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Tribunal deleted the ALP adjustment of Rs. 4,25,09,332, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the additional ground raised by the assessee as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>