<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168240</link>
    <description>A statutory takeover of aided schools became effective only on completion of the prescribed recommendation and Government acceptance process, and Section 4 applied only to qualified employees already working before takeover. Untrained teachers appointed after the cutoff date and excluded by the Government&#039;s order under Section 8 could not claim deemed Government servant status or regularisation on takeover. A writ of mandamus could not be issued to compel the State to act contrary to the statute. The claim to be treated as Government servants from 1.1.1971 was rejected, the direction for regularisation was unsustainable, and the High Court&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168240</link>
      <description>A statutory takeover of aided schools became effective only on completion of the prescribed recommendation and Government acceptance process, and Section 4 applied only to qualified employees already working before takeover. Untrained teachers appointed after the cutoff date and excluded by the Government&#039;s order under Section 8 could not claim deemed Government servant status or regularisation on takeover. A writ of mandamus could not be issued to compel the State to act contrary to the statute. The claim to be treated as Government servants from 1.1.1971 was rejected, the direction for regularisation was unsustainable, and the High Court&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>