https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168238 Interference with an interlocutory injunction in a power purchase agreement dispute was declined because the controversy involved triable issues on the meaning of "installed capacity" and on whether the matter belonged in arbitration or before the Electricity Regulatory Commission. The Court treated interim relief as dependent on the usual injunction factors: serious question to be tried, prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, preservation of status quo, and the parties' prior conduct. It also considered the risk of conflicting interim orders and judicial comity. The High Court's interim arrangement was left in place and the substantive issues remained open in the pending proceedings. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168238 Interference with an interlocutory injunction in a power purchase agreement dispute was declined because the controversy involved triable issues on the meaning of "installed capacity" and on whether the matter belonged in arbitration or before the Electricity Regulatory Commission. The Court treated interim relief as dependent on the usual injunction factors: serious question to be tried, prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, preservation of status quo, and the parties' prior conduct. It also considered the risk of conflicting interim orders and judicial comity. The High Court's interim arrangement was left in place and the substantive issues remained open in the pending proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168238