https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256195 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing authorities not to take coercive action and defreezing the appellant's bank accounts. The freezing of the accounts by the Deputy Director, DGCEI was deemed unjustified once the mandatory deposit of 7.5% of duty liability was made. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory requirements and protecting the appellant's rights during the appeal process, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal procedures and refraining from actions beyond the statutory framework. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256195 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing authorities not to take coercive action and defreezing the appellant's bank accounts. The freezing of the accounts by the Deputy Director, DGCEI was deemed unjustified once the mandatory deposit of 7.5% of duty liability was made. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory requirements and protecting the appellant's rights during the appeal process, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal procedures and refraining from actions beyond the statutory framework. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256195