<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 192 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the service tax demand and penalties in favor of the applicant in a case concerning the interpretation of a lease agreement for service tax liability under the &quot;Supply of tangible goods&quot; category. The Tribunal found that the applicant had operational control of the aircraft as per the agreement, contrary to the adjudicating authority&#039;s view. It noted the applicant&#039;s responsibility for maintenance, except for engine replacement, and considered the legal aspects of the transaction, ultimately ruling in favor of the applicant and waiving the pre-deposit requirement until the appeal&#039;s final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 192 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the service tax demand and penalties in favor of the applicant in a case concerning the interpretation of a lease agreement for service tax liability under the &quot;Supply of tangible goods&quot; category. The Tribunal found that the applicant had operational control of the aircraft as per the agreement, contrary to the adjudicating authority&#039;s view. It noted the applicant&#039;s responsibility for maintenance, except for engine replacement, and considered the legal aspects of the transaction, ultimately ruling in favor of the applicant and waiving the pre-deposit requirement until the appeal&#039;s final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>