<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256188</link>
    <description>A stay application for assessment demand must consider both the nature of the disputed liability and the taxpayer&#039;s financial hardship. Where the underlying issue is debatable, penalty should ordinarily not be included in the deposit condition unless strong prima facie reasons justify it. The Tribunal also had to assess hardship before fixing the quantum of pre-deposit. Because the order directing deposit of 30 per cent of the dues, including penalty, was made without adequate consideration of these factors, it was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256188</link>
      <description>A stay application for assessment demand must consider both the nature of the disputed liability and the taxpayer&#039;s financial hardship. Where the underlying issue is debatable, penalty should ordinarily not be included in the deposit condition unless strong prima facie reasons justify it. The Tribunal also had to assess hardship before fixing the quantum of pre-deposit. Because the order directing deposit of 30 per cent of the dues, including penalty, was made without adequate consideration of these factors, it was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>