<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256187</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court agreed that there was no violation of Rules 4 and 6 as the goods were self-assessed and duty was paid as required. Emphasizing the need for clear violations to justify penalties, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with the relevant rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256187</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court agreed that there was no violation of Rules 4 and 6 as the goods were self-assessed and duty was paid as required. Emphasizing the need for clear violations to justify penalties, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with the relevant rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>