<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various grounds, including excluding notional interest from ALV computation, allowing deduction of maintenance expenses, and permitting lease rentals. The AO was directed to recalculate profits under Section 145A. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable due to relief granted in the quantum appeal. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various grounds, including excluding notional interest from ALV computation, allowing deduction of maintenance expenses, and permitting lease rentals. The AO was directed to recalculate profits under Section 145A. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable due to relief granted in the quantum appeal. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>