<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, stating that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive when the addition has become debatable. However, it clarified that if the Tribunal&#039;s order on quantum addition is upheld by the Hon&#039;ble High Court, the Department is free to proceed in accordance with the law on penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, stating that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive when the addition has become debatable. However, it clarified that if the Tribunal&#039;s order on quantum addition is upheld by the Hon&#039;ble High Court, the Department is free to proceed in accordance with the law on penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>