<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 154 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256154</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Revenue: Rs. 5,00,000 for unexplained gifts, Rs. 11,80,000 for unexplained unsecured loans, and Rs. 7,000 for travelling and conveyance expenses. The Ld. CIT(A) accepted the assessee&#039;s evidence for gifts and loans, emphasizing the duty to prove genuineness. Regarding expenses, no discrepancies were found. The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order in full, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 154 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256154</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Revenue: Rs. 5,00,000 for unexplained gifts, Rs. 11,80,000 for unexplained unsecured loans, and Rs. 7,000 for travelling and conveyance expenses. The Ld. CIT(A) accepted the assessee&#039;s evidence for gifts and loans, emphasizing the duty to prove genuineness. Regarding expenses, no discrepancies were found. The ITAT affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order in full, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>