<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168221</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the unclaimed outstanding balances written back by the assessee were treated as income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the unilateral act of writing back the liabilities without evidence that they had not ceased did not support the assessee&#039;s position, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upholding the addition of Rs. 31,45,526 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168221</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the unclaimed outstanding balances written back by the assessee were treated as income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the unilateral act of writing back the liabilities without evidence that they had not ceased did not support the assessee&#039;s position, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upholding the addition of Rs. 31,45,526 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>