<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256134</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the single Judge&#039;s decision, dismissing the writ petition and directing the appellant to pursue the matter before the appellate authority for redressal of the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing statutory forums for fiscal matters and advised the appellant to raise all relevant points, including the limitation issue, before the appellate authority for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256134</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the single Judge&#039;s decision, dismissing the writ petition and directing the appellant to pursue the matter before the appellate authority for redressal of the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing statutory forums for fiscal matters and advised the appellant to raise all relevant points, including the limitation issue, before the appellate authority for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>