<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256133</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the clubbing of clearances of two units for excise duty calculation. It was ruled that the units operated independently with complete machinery and shared resources did not justify clubbing clearances. The tribunal emphasized the units&#039; independence in manufacturing goods and dismissed the argument that shared facilities indicated one unit as a dummy of the other.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256133</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the clubbing of clearances of two units for excise duty calculation. It was ruled that the units operated independently with complete machinery and shared resources did not justify clubbing clearances. The tribunal emphasized the units&#039; independence in manufacturing goods and dismissed the argument that shared facilities indicated one unit as a dummy of the other.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>