<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting allegations of shortages and clandestine removal. The decision emphasized the need for thorough verification processes and substantial evidence to establish duty liabilities, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:22:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting allegations of shortages and clandestine removal. The decision emphasized the need for thorough verification processes and substantial evidence to establish duty liabilities, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>