<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, holding that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, is retrospective from 1.4.2005. Therefore, any payment of TDS made before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) should be allowed as a deduction. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance made by the CIT was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, holding that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, is retrospective from 1.4.2005. Therefore, any payment of TDS made before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) should be allowed as a deduction. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance made by the CIT was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>