<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256111</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals in part, directing the AO to reframe the assessment for both years using the percentage completion method for revenue recognition. The ITAT instructed the AO to allow compensation expenditure as revenue expenses, emphasizing the need for consistency in accounting methods and recognizing the commercial nature of the compensation paid by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256111</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals in part, directing the AO to reframe the assessment for both years using the percentage completion method for revenue recognition. The ITAT instructed the AO to allow compensation expenditure as revenue expenses, emphasizing the need for consistency in accounting methods and recognizing the commercial nature of the compensation paid by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>