https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168214 An Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as a "tribunal" within Article 136 because it performs judicial or quasi-judicial adjudication, hears rival claims, receives evidence, and determines rights; its award was therefore capable of special leave scrutiny. The award was also considered vulnerable where findings of victimisation lacked proper evidentiary support, the hearing and proof did not conform to the statutory scheme and natural justice, and the award was not signed by all members who heard the dispute. Mandatory procedural compliance, including constitution and signing requirements, was treated as essential to validity. en-us Fri, 26 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:08:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168214 An Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as a "tribunal" within Article 136 because it performs judicial or quasi-judicial adjudication, hears rival claims, receives evidence, and determines rights; its award was therefore capable of special leave scrutiny. The award was also considered vulnerable where findings of victimisation lacked proper evidentiary support, the hearing and proof did not conform to the statutory scheme and natural justice, and the award was not signed by all members who heard the dispute. Mandatory procedural compliance, including constitution and signing requirements, was treated as essential to validity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168214