https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168213 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of communicating all entries in Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) to employees for fairness and transparency. The court held that failure to communicate even a 'good' entry violated natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution, leading to arbitrariness. The appellant was directed to be considered for promotion retroactively upon communication of the 'good' entry, entitling him to benefits including higher pension and arrears of pay with interest. The decision highlighted the significance of upholding principles of natural justice and equality in administrative actions. en-us Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168213 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of communicating all entries in Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) to employees for fairness and transparency. The court held that failure to communicate even a 'good' entry violated natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution, leading to arbitrariness. The appellant was directed to be considered for promotion retroactively upon communication of the 'good' entry, entitling him to benefits including higher pension and arrears of pay with interest. The decision highlighted the significance of upholding principles of natural justice and equality in administrative actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168213