https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168212 During suspension of enforcement of Article 21 under a Presidential order under Article 359(1), a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 challenging preventive detention on grounds of illegality, non-compliance with the detention law, mala fides, or extraneous considerations is barred because it is, in substance, an attempt to enforce the suspended right to personal liberty. Section 16A(9) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act was treated as an evidentiary restriction operating within the emergency framework, keeping grounds and materials confidential without destroying the court's constitutional jurisdiction. The emergency constitutional and statutory scheme was therefore upheld. en-us Wed, 28 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168212 During suspension of enforcement of Article 21 under a Presidential order under Article 359(1), a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 challenging preventive detention on grounds of illegality, non-compliance with the detention law, mala fides, or extraneous considerations is barred because it is, in substance, an attempt to enforce the suspended right to personal liberty. Section 16A(9) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act was treated as an evidentiary restriction operating within the emergency framework, keeping grounds and materials confidential without destroying the court's constitutional jurisdiction. The emergency constitutional and statutory scheme was therefore upheld. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 28 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168212